Germany’s Dilemma – Sacrifice Cyprus or Make Sacrifices Itself…

dino_2010_12_10_martirio_marcantonio_bragadinThis is an updated and linked version of a column published in The Irish Examiner Saturday 24 March 2013.The deposit tax debacle in Cyprus is rich in historical resonances as well as showing that frankly as Leigh Phillips suggests in the EUobserver Europe is run by the three stooges. Skinning the Cypriots is not new. In 1571 in the height of the venetian ottoman war the defenders of Famagusta stood staunchly against the ottomans. On surrendering the leader was, despite promises of safe passage, skinned alive. Now we see that despite promises to “do whatever it takes” the ECB has supported skinning cypriot deposits. How doing whatever it takes squares with destroying trust in banking, bullying small nations and serially upping the ante is beyond me. Its even  almost beyond Karl Whelan.

hacha_emilEurope seems unable to work in a sensible manner, and is devolving into a crisis junkie. Again we see a meeting at 3am making decisions that in a fog of fatigue may have seemed sensible but on waking perhaps less so. The historical ironies pile up and people make mistakes.  Cyprus is a small nation, far away. In 1939 a hegemonic Germany called the president of the independent rump of Czechoslovakia to a meeting. Hacha though the meeting was going to be bad but was subjected to a grilling and a haranguing that resulted in his collapse and the death of his country. What we saw in the meetings last week was, I would argue, little different. No, Im not suggesting that the Troika are Nazis. I am suggesting that big countries and their acolytes tend to have modes of operation that can be hidden for decades and then, to everyones surprise, come back to the fore. While not suggesting that anyone is going to invade the 60% of Cyprus not under occupation, the reports of the Eurogroup meeting are frankly nauseating. A hegemonic Germany, its allies and with the silent acquiescence of the rest of europe  placed unreasonable demands on a small country. But we have seen this time and again and not just in the 1930s. If this is to be a union then it must be a union of equals. Even in the USA the bigger states cannot dictate to the smaller, save via the federal system.

imagesThe historical ironies mount up. A century ago nobody really wanted a pan european war (At least not in 1914) and yet we found ourselves at war through a combination of poor diplomacy, overreaction to minor events, and a rigid adherence to plans laid in different times.  Even as late as the start of the war Kaiser Wilhelm wanted to call it off to be told that the ReichBahn couldnt alter its plans and the trains were rolling. I dont know if Germany wants to kill the Cypriot model, although it has made it clear that they see it as dead. I do know that this approach, of frankly bullying and using the golden rule in its most naked form, is neither in the political or economic interest of the union. If you think that I am alone consider the views of Christopher Mahoney, who argues that the approach being taken will result in a latin american style EU. We may yet (although I do not think so) see Cyprus leaving the euro, and showing that that is possible, from a combination of these same factors. We have learned nothing in a century – neither how to live with a strong Germany nor how to contain a rampant Germany.  There is an excellent article on the new German problem in The New Statesman.

Kipper Williams on CyprusThe genie is now out of the bottle with regard to depositors. Just this week and under the radar Spain introduced a deposit tax. Yes, it will be small (for now) and yes it will be paid by the banks (of course they wont pass it onto the customers…of course) but there it is. Commerzbank have mused on  deposit tax for Italy. Deposits, including guaranteed deposits, are now in the firing line and we should all be wary and aware of that.El-Arian of PIMCO compared this to “lighting dynamite”, and he is right. Again go back to Mahoney of Moodys, linked above. He notes that we are now seeing the rise of “non convertible euros”, something unique. And why? for a few billon euro. Never has so much been at stake for so little.

748203817-1 There are good arguments for bailing in creditors of failing banks, depositors  at some stages included. What there are not good reasons for is crashing an entire economy or for destroying fundamental trust. Even with capital controls, Cyprus is in for a massive crash. .  Simple economics (remember them?) remind us that MV=PY. M is money, V is how quickly it moves around, P is the price level and Y is income. This isn’t a model it is not a forecast its an accounting identity. With M in Cyprus going to fall like a stone then either money works harder, the price level falls (deflation, more destructive than inflation arguably) or the income level falls. Most probably all will happen but given prices tend to be downwardly sticky I suspect the majority of the adjustment will come on the level of national income. Estimates from market sources are for a 20% drop, and this is supposed to be the good outcome? Even with capital controls in place, and In passing we might wonder how exactly we can build a union built on free movement of goods, capital and people with capital controls, who now will trust cypriot banks? You dont have to be a wild eurosceptic to think that the introduction of capital controls is the death knell of the euro. There is an excellent blog on this issue in the Telegraph. Imagine capital control in say Warwickshire viz a viz the rest of the UK, Vermont versus the USA, Leitrim versus the rest of Ireland. Thats what we are now proposing.

images-1The proposal now (friday morning) on the table is to save guaranteed deposits and move unguaranteed (those over 100k) into a bad bank where they might end up getting only 40-50% return. There will also be a sovereign solidarity fund and some gas bonds. While few will grieve for oligarchs losing money lets sit back. companies, charities, people with money saved prudently and legally, anyone who is in the middle of a transactions chain with cash at the moment will also be cut. This will hit prudent cypriots and Cypriot SMEs hard. It might well hit some oligarchs but to be honest they will have their money stored in yachts in Monaco and Belgravian mansions not on deposit in Laki bank. The Russians that will be hit are those middle class savers who have done well from the last two decades and who, legally or no, saved that money in Cyprus to reduce the chance of expropriation. Sure, some mafiosi will be cut but are we now adopting collective punishment?

a_grouchy_german_is_a_sour_kraut_mesh_hats-p148042438037453225enxqa_400Cyprus has been sacrificed on bad grounds. Its banks are overly large (although not as large as some other EU countries as % GDP) and the business model was flawed. But they were holed below the waterline with greek bond cuts and the collapse of the greek economy.They asked repeatedly over the last 9 months for assistance and when it came it was too late and flawed.  The unwillingness of the europeans to consider flexibility in how to deal not with a bank but a banking system that was imploding is dogmatism at its worst. There are alternative plans out there that will deflate the cypriot banking sector without crashing the economy. But none of them seem to satisfy what is increasingly looking like a teutonic desire for exemplary punishment “die andere zu ermutigen” as it were….Every time a proposal emerges for sensible enhancement of the crisis management capacity of the eurozone so too will some obscure german to explain why the voters in lower thuringia won’t like it. The banking union, the existence of which might have saved this from being a quasi existential crisis, is stalled, on the rocks of German intransigence and unwillingness to realise that they are the leaders and that that involves leading. And sometimes to lead is to incur costs.  Germany is not the eurozone and its time that this was made clear by the others.  Either they pull their weight, and yes that may mean some costs somewhere down the line, or the eurozone staggers on at best with a lost generation at worst towards a breakup that will cost Germany anyhow. Forget Cyprus – Germany is the real problem state in Europe right now. Brendan Simms posits it well in his New Statesman article

The question we face now is this: how can the Federal Republic, which is prosperous and secure as never before, be persuaded to take the political initiative and make the necessary economic sacrifices to complete the work of European unity?

Over to you Germany….

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Germany’s Dilemma – Sacrifice Cyprus or Make Sacrifices Itself…

  1. Pingback: Cyprus Bailout: Depositors taxed 9.9% - Page 393

  2. Arthur Doohan

    Great article.
    Is there a small ‘typo’ in the 2nd para?
    “Hacha though the meeting was going to be bad” should be ‘thoughT’.

    But you’re right, after 75 years, the powers of Europe are, once again, running around appeasing a resurgent Germany in the vain hope of staving off a calamity.

    History is repeating itself; first as farce…will there be a tragic further reiteration?

    Reply
  3. Peter Pipesmoker

    The Cypriots should have Walked and taken the Economic Collapse like Iceland. Yes it’s Very Rough but at least the Boil is lanced.You are master of your own affairs and Control Your Central Bank and your Interest Rates are appropriate for Your Economy . Countries buying into some Notion or system of Euro Solidarity and the avoidance of too much pain in the Short Run are actually signing their Country Long Term into a Much Longer Term Decline with a kind of Ongoing Background “Misery” Music that makes the Country a far more Unpleasant Place to live and even more importantly discourages Investment as People wait for obvious signs of things turning up which never actually come . Then the Emigration kicks in even harder, sealing the Country’s long Term Fate. It will only end when the Country’s People Collectively realise that the Euro and by Extension the EU Control Freaks are the Cause of the Permanent fall in Living Standards. Just like with Cancer the Answer is to Face the fact that once and for all, the Euro – At a Minimum and possibly a lessor Free Trade Connection/Membership of the EU – will have to be cut out if the Country wants a decent Economy creating a decent
    standard of Living for Citizens .In Truth these Banking Crises are all revealing the Wider Wrakness of the Whole EU Project as a successful Governing Agency. In Truth it has merely shifted from a Peace Project between Countries to One where Governments are United to The Point of never Warring Amongst Themselves and have “Solidarity” over how to punish and wage War against their Citizens for the Greater Glory Of the EU Project which will eventually deliver a Tower of Babel/Utopia for their Children’s Generation . In fact all they are actually doing is making the Parents Poor today and still managing to Dump Unpayable Debt on Unborn Children. At Essence the EU Project’s Race is Run it has made Europe Permanently Weaker and Poorer its just People don’t realise it and the Wealthy Elites won’t let it for their own Financial Gain.
    Yours Sincerely ,Peter Pipesmoker .

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Cyprus — Bucking the ECB » Bock The Robber

  5. Diego Espinosa

    Excellent article. However, the Cyprus deposit tax does not affect “M”. Like any tax, it results in a transfer of deposits from private sector accounts to the government’s. The monetary base and M1 are unaffected. Of course, the tax will affect velocity, so the outcome on M*V is similar to the one you propose.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s