Are MOOCs the future for the Irish Higher Education Sector?

This is an extended version of an opinion piece published in the Irish Examiner

Over the last decade or more the language of management has permeated more and more into higher education. For some this is the trump of doom, as they see the accompanying managerialism as being the death knell of the university. Others, myself included, take this with a grain of salt. Universities, indeed all higher education, consists of large complex organizations dealing with tens of thousands of individuals and hundreds of millions of euro. The principles of good management are pretty much universal. Whether one is the abbot of a trappist monastery, the provost of Trinity College, the CEO of a coffee chain, work needs to be organized, finances managed, and the needs and aspirations of those who hold (or perceive that they hold) a stake in the continued success of the organization need to be managed. The differences emerge primarily from the different objectives of the organizations that in turn shape the structure of how the organization works. In universities the stakeholders are the staff the students and the society. These have different time horizons over which they see their needs as to be met, and aren’t always able to differentiate the short and long term.

Without getting too managerial we can then think of higher education as an industry. It consists of lots of units, some big some small, all of whom compete and cooperate with each other as the task at hand requires. We can and should then look at this industry with cool eyes. That is not to say that a managerial or economic perspective must dominate. Higher education, universities in particular, generate both public and private returns to investment. The public good is hard to quantify, and thus the standard market pricing mechanisms are not fully suited to resource allocation. In other words, the public must, if they wish  the public good to be coproduced with the private good, pay for this. The challenge for universities is not to be efficient – that is simply good management and should be automatic. It is to justify to the public who pay for the public good that the usage of the public resources are as efficient as possible. Alas, in the present state of discourse there seems a needed step is to convince the government and the public that there is such a public good produced.

Part of the change I and others see in public attitudes is the emergence of what are called MOOCs : massive online open courses. These in essence are online courses into which pretty much anyone can enroll. I myself am enrolled on one on Asrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life, which is on the Coursera platform run out of Edinburgh. The distinguishing feature of the Coursera  and EdX programs are that they are populated by high-profile highly respected research led faculty from leading universities. Courses are available not just in “fun” subjects such as above but in a  wide variety of computer science, mathematics, biology and humanites subjects.  These courses require registration, online attendance etc and run quizzes and so forth, to allow people to say, at least to their own satisfaction, that they have taken the course Also wildly popular is the Khan Academy, where a bewildering variety of courses in almost anything. And in Ireland we see the success of Hibernia, which operates a blended approach with mostly online lectures and some on the ground practical instruction in required areas

So far so meh some may say – this represents no threat, as universities control the certification process, via rigorous checks on the identity and integrity of students and their work.  the emergence recently of two initiatives should cause significant concern for Irish higher education.

First, we see the emergence at the lower middle end of universities of a refined blended model. A number of US universities are experimenting with allowing students to enroll on MOOCs, to take the courses and pass examinations (under exam conditions) and to carry that credit as part of courses in the same way as a regular student. Crucially, they see the MOOC not as a substitute or an apocalyptic threat but as a marketing tool. They find that students who take a MOOC tend to be enthused to take other non-online courses. The MOOC is a marketing tool. Second, at the top end we see certification emerging – Coursera for examples allows students to achieve certification in courses using a combination of IT and other security features, while EdX allows for students to take an old fashioned examination with certification if desired. Thus the strategic moat that was certification is crumbling: a student can in theory take a self designed structured set of courses from a set of world leading universities and present evidence to employers that they have, for example , reached the MIT level in computer programming or cybernetics or the Harvard level in biology.

Where then stands the Irish third level? Employing 23,000 staff (9400 academic….) and reaching 13,000 students it’s a large industry. As of 2011 for all HEA funded institutions, university and IT, only 4000 students, 2%, were engaged in what it terms flexible learning, which includes distance and in service education. Compare this with the USA where 30% of all students take at least one course online. Ireland has a long way to go. Credit based courses where students can take their degrees in their own time at their own pace are a rarity ; most HE institutions are barely visible online; not a single Irish university has or seems to have plans to have a MOOC (although TCD is contemplating one and is hosting a major international symposium on online education in February) ; UCC is developing a major online presence in postgraduate education across a number of areas ; the HEA is understood to be supportive of moves to create a greater online presence while preserving the on campus experience. Thus some movement might reasonably be expected in the near future. While the obvious MOOC , if we want it to act as a shop window for Irish universities, would be one on Irish studies, we should not stop there. Despite the doom that is poured out that we have no university in the top 100, every single Irish university is in the top 5% of the THES rankings. Every one is world class. We have a world-class industry here. Within disciplines we have world-class researchers and teachers, in pretty much ever-single discipline. A MOOC or ten would demonstrate that, to the public and to the wider world. Every international student is an export – lets place ourselves in the world shop window.

11 thoughts on “Are MOOCs the future for the Irish Higher Education Sector?

  1. Pingback: Are MOOCs the future for the Irish Higher Education Sector? | AAEEBL -- MOOCs, Badges & ePortfolios |

  2. Pingback: Are MOOCs the future for the Irish Higher Education Sector? | AAEEBL -- International Research Group |

  3. iainmacl

    As you probably suspect, Brian, there are indeed discussions about MOOCs in Irish institutions other than the ones you mention. Indeed, it would be odd if not all Universities (and perhaps a few IoTs that might have the resources) are not at least muttering internally about the biggest news hype item of the past year! In at least one case I am aware of there have been proposals, discussions and considerations of content, style, partnerships etc, and indeed some of staff have experience not just of ‘students’ in many MOOCs but co-facilitators. There are questions over appropriate content/themes, technical models, marketing and distinctive approaches. Constraints, of course, include those of the current staffing requirements, workloads, etc, but there is no shortage of imagination and enthusiasm tempered by rational critique of the model.

    As for other more ‘traditional’ (ironic, isn’t it?!) online and blended programmes, well I know of one institution, NUI Galway, which already has over 60 full programmes ranging from undergraduate degrees to postgraduate qualifications with new offerings being developed including a range of CPD modules (see for example,

    A number of these have been running for over ten years and involve partnerships with international institutions. Participation and membership of international professional organisations in the field of online learning, multimedia and instructional design and the extensive use of a range of new technologies and platforms complement this work. I’m not trying to advertise these specific programmes, but just to point out to some of your readers that quite a bit happens beyond the pale that might not get much attention in some metropolitan media.

    Back to the question of MOOCs, it’s great to see your enthusiasm for them as a shop-window for Irish HE and to raise its profile internationally. The trick of course, is for us to get our acts together, but also to think carefully about the right approach so that we’re not firing off lots of offerings that struggle to be noticed by the wider online world and in which the ‘M’ comes back to bite us! Of course, there are alternative models too which might be less focused on the sign-up numbers and more on the quality and the learner experience.

    1. brianmlucey Post author

      Hi ian
      I did ask all the universities for comment. .. on Wednesday last. Ucd replies yesterday abdominal that was if course too late but nothing from the others

      1. iainmacl

        Ah that’s more about internal communications than anything else, I guess. Lots of people working away but not necessarily contacted for these kinds of things…and different internal structures/responsibilities. At least two of the institutions have current vacancies in the relevant posts too, some are restructuring internally, etc. Fun times for all.

      2. brianmlucey Post author

        Perhaps. But again, if the internal comms are so bad then what hope?
        Plus, best way to do a mooc? Get someone who is a good communicator, with a good research based course, let em off. Far too much bureaucracy. Empower and deploy academics

    2. John Rochford

      Hi Brian,
      While I take Ian’s point on board about the Blended and Online courses offered by NUIG, these courses are not ‘free’ , where MOOCs are free at the moment. I can testify (currently to postgraduate) – blended learning course NUIG Galway. Brian your point is well made about the need for Irish HEIs to sit up and take stock and perhaps learn of a few lessons on using MOOCs as a mechanism for recognition of prior learning (RPI). Wlodkowski (2008) talks about the competence -confidence cycle, in that the more competent a student becomes the more confident they become, which might in turn eventually lead them through the cyber or physical doors of our Irish HEIs.
      Wlodkowski (2008) Enhancing Adult Monivation to Learn. 3rd ed. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  4. Gavin Henrick

    Aside from the “Free education aspect” (where I believe that MOOCs are mainly beneficial to self-directed learners), MOOCs are clearly a very good marketing tool.

    I think MOOCs have a value beyond the Free Education and beyond the marketing tool, but also as a tool to pre-university students to introduce them to higher education learning styles and the specific content so they can help know better if it is an area they want to explore for a number of years. The technology exists (IMS LTI) to integrate a MOOC course directly into school LMS to help in this area. I know a number of institutions in Ireland are exploring this at present.

    I referred to this blogged about these thoughts last month ->

    Coincidentally, the same week that the mentioned symposium is taking place in TCD on Feb 19th, we are running an international Moodle conference ( ) is taking place out in the Crowne Plaza Northwood from 18th-21st The conference is more practitioner focused, and helps share the experiences from dozens of institutions in helping deliver blended learning often through the social constructionist pedagogy around which principles the platform is built.

    I wonder will we see an explosion of MOOCs which are controlled in volume of participants to help focus on the quality rather than the quantity. How can a forum which has 70,000 people wanting to post a comment generate the same depth of discussion and reflection as one with 200 who all have more of a chance to get into the discussions with each more.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s